Kadir's Blog on Everything

Mobile, Consumer Products, Product Management and the Miscellany

…jobs we hire a PC to do are being increasingly done by dedicated devices. If Adobe wants to be relevant in a world where users interact with as many as five different devices in a day, then a per-device licensing model is clearly unsustainable.

Enter the SaaS model. Users can use Adobe products on as many devices as they wish. It is, ultimately, an obvious and necessary shift, and kudos to Adobe for doing it.

He went on to discuss how difficult it is to monetize productivity software and discussed how this model increases the fair value for Adobe (instead of making money on new releases) and different types of consumers (One-off, professional and enthusiast). 

Consider again the three types of consumers I listed above:

  • The price is much more approachable for Consumer A. He can “try out” Photoshop, and if he ends up not using it, he can simply end his subscription. More importantly, there will be a lot more Consumer As, and some of them will stay subscribed.
  • Consumer B will get a great deal right off the bat, but as she uses Photoshop throughout her career, Adobe will be along for the ride, making revenue every month as opposed to every few years.
  • Consumer C is similar to A: Photoshop will be much more approachable, and there will be a lot more Customer Cs. As they become real users, Adobe moves with them.

Adobe can make money out of Consumer A and C who never ventured into photo editing due to high cost.

Posted at 2:29pm and tagged with: Product Management, business model, Cloud, service, adobe,.

 

In reality, this Explorer Edition isn’t supposed to be thought of in that way. The current version of Glass is intended for developers and a lucky few others, and as a research project, it is a fascinating one. Developers will want to get their hands on this ASAP and, frankly, we hope that they do because we can’t wait to see what they can do with it. 

Google Glass has lot of potential. It will be interesting to see how this pans out in next few months. Google has to lower the $1500 price tag and make it bit more easy to get for developers / companies to explore and come up with something interesting. 

Privacy is another concern - are you recording a video or just wearing your Google Glass?

Posted at 2:59pm and tagged with: google, GoogleGlass, Review,.

During peak periods of internet use in the US, Netflix constitutes 33% of all downstream traffic, which means content that goes into the device instead of out. That’s more than Google’s YouTube (14.8%), BitTorrent (5.9%), Apple’s iTunes (3.9%), Amazon Video (1.8%), and Facebook (1.5%), among others. Netflix isn’t as dominant in mobile internet use, where it has just 2.7% to YouTube’s 31%, but that’s the next battleground.

Bandwidth is a good metric to watch because it arguably measures the depth of attention commanded by these big media companies. Facebook obviously controls a large share of internet use, but the content it serves isn’t as rich, or bandwidth-heavy, as YouTube or Netflix. In theory, the richer media should ultimately translate into more revenue.

Posted at 11:15am and tagged with: netflix, data, Internet, mobile,.

iPad still dominates tablet ads impression.

Posted at 4:05pm.

iPad still dominates tablet ads impression.

 “…data will enable us to drive better experiences for our customers. It also will allow us to help merchants of all sizes drive deeper consumer engagement and loyalty in a connected commerce world. We have massive amounts of data. And we are just beginning to leverage our data to drive innovative, personalized customer experiences. Our advantage is not just the amount of data we have…But we have a massive amount of closed loop data. What other companies struggle to create, we already know – each step of a consumer’s commerce journey.”

Posted at 8:52pm and tagged with: EBay, Customization,.

Sapphire, a crystalline form of aluminum oxide, probably won’t ever be as cheap as Gorilla Glass, the durable material from Corning that’s used to make screens on iPhones and other smartphones. A Gorilla Glass display costs less than $3, while a sapphire display would cost about $30. But that could fall below $20 in a couple of years thanks to increased competition and improving technology, says Eric Virey, an analyst for the market research firm Yole Développement. And since sapphire performs better than glass, that price could make it cheap enough to compete, he says.

Posted at 6:56pm and tagged with: apple, iPad, Iphone, Technology, MIT,.

Amazon recommendations worked for certain categories like books – people with similar tastes bought similar books and the set diagram approach (affinity analysis) to recommendations worked for them. However, Amazon expanded to include more items, various suppliers and it is time recommendations improve along the business.

Amazon has two sets of users – people who go there with a specific item in mind and want to find a better bargain for a particular item. Other group of users goes to Amazon with a specific category in mind, like Eau de Cologne or movies. They know that they want to buys something new but do not know which brand or item to buy. They are there to browse through and find an item – existing recommendations does not work for them.

Recently, I was after cologne or two. I was not sure what I want so I thought I would browse the store and find something interesting. In the home page, I see list of items I viewed recently. If I go to a category, then I see ‘Customers who bought items in your recent history also bought…’ I see lot of recommendations there but they are items I just browsed.

This is where the recommendation is failing – I like particular type of colognes but I do not see them in the list at all. It was not personalized to me.

Let us take, Terre D’hermes for example. It is woody spicy with citrus accord. I like it and I bought it last summer. Comparable colognes would be Allure Homme Sport, La Nuit de l’Homme and to some extend Acqua di Gio Pour Homme and L’eau D’Issey pour Homme. I provided these as an example because they are either Citrus accord or woody spicy / woody aquatic variants - chances of me buying these something would increase if I see any of these in my recommendation tab.

Instead, I saw recommendations that were totally off including ‘Paris Hilton for Women’ and ‘S by Shakira’.

Amazon has everything going for them: tons of products, tons of transactions and tons of people and purchase / behavior history of users. Is there a possibility to fine-tune the recommendations?

I think the key is to use the metadata. Though Amazon never exposes the tags, I was able to find it buried in the recommendations page. Recommendations page let’s you customize your recommendations and rate products similar to Netflix’s recommendations page. In there, I found Amazon’s tag associated with Terre D’hermes. I can add the tags to the product. They are crowd sourced and not perfect.

My biggest problem is that they make you do lot of work to set up your recommendation. Even for items from your previous purchase needs addition of tags so they could be used for recommendation.

Also, these tags should be part of the item’s inventory. It can include user tags but each items should have attributes as tags. If Amazon has it, it was not exposed. I am going to assume that it does and hypothesize how it can used to improve recommendations.

Based on my previous purchase history, t would be awesome to see a capped list of ‘earthly’ colognes because of my previous Terre D’hermes purchase. Generally people prefer heavy colognes for winter and lighter / fresh ones for summer. Based on season and purchase pattern, I could get different colognes or fine-tuned ‘earthly’ colognes selections based on different variables. It is one step better than just purchase history. Items with more peer reviews should be a variable too – more positively reviewed items should get higher weight.

Just for colognes, there is lot of variables and signals for a targeted recommendation. For clothes, kids shopping, etc., you need to find set of unique variables and signals for recommendations. Fashion shops / designers have unique style, people from different countries buy different styles of clothes, colors size, other clothing articles to complete your set, season, and even clothing cuts (European, regular, slim), etc. are signals for recommendation. If you use these against a person’s purchase history, the recommendation will get better.

With Kindle, Amazon is in a unique place to recommend targeted personalized options. They have huge data set and through Kindle more personal data that other online retailers might not even dream of. Shows and movie people watch, social graph – Facebook attributes like birthday, friends list, likes, check-ins, following, etc., can help personalize better. Kindle can leverage ‘X-Ray’ and recommend purchase options for certain show or events. For example, Oscar Red Carpet event can have purchase recommendation for original / similar accessories, clothes worn by the actors / actress.

A ‘Similar’ category should not only generate other clothing options but also lower / higher price points for a particular item.

Recommendation is science but also an art. It takes lot of data, interpretation of data, user behavior to get there. Personalized recommendations provides 10% boost to the sales per various case studies – even if revenue increases by 1-2%, it is a good chuck of change. 

Amazon is a data driven company – they capture and analyze lot of data and experiment them to increase sales. I am curious whether they do anything similar to what I have outlined for recommendations.

Posted at 2:22pm and tagged with: Amazon, Product Management, Recommendation,.

For the weekend!

Posted at 1:13pm and tagged with: Travel, Computation, OTA,.

Update: Sacha Grief wrote a wonderful post on the battle between flat design and skeuomorphism

But a more subtle yet much deeper problem lies in the very concept of functionally skeuomorphic interfaces, independently of whether their appearance is realist or not.

That problem is that when borrowing elements from a design’s previous incarnation, you often also bring its limitations along for the ride, even when these limitations have no reason to exist anymore.

For example, calendars have traditionally featured one month per page, because they’re limited by the physical concept of the page.

But although the digital medium has no such limitation, many digital calendars still adhere to the one-month-per-screen rule out of tradition instead of (for example) centering the view on the current week. 

Apple was bit heavy on skeuomorphism. Microsoft went other way and with ‘Metro’, it became flat. It also pushed the content to the forefront. Google, interestingly, is taking a different approach - minimalistic skeuomorphism. Look at Google Maps for iOS.

And while flat design is often purely visual, it does resonate with designer’s love of minimalist concepts, embodied by the famous Antoine de Saint-Exupery that “perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.

Posted at 11:13am and tagged with: Design, User Interface, User Experience,.